The Battle Of Shiloh May It Never Be Forgotten - 2315 Words

The Battle of Shiloh: May It Never Be Forgotten On April 5th, 1862, the fields and thickets surrounding Shiloh church was just another peaceful backwoods landscape. Soon it would undergo a horrific transformation. The cheerful chirping of birds would be replaced by whizzing of flying pieces of metal shot with the intent to kill. The green grass of the hillsides would be trampled and splattered his blood and gore. Instead of the plains being inhabited by the occasional deer, they would be the home to wild hogs feeding on the corpses of both blue and gray indiscriminately. The Battle of Shiloh would take this place and make it a living hell for the soldiers involved, all of the former peace just a memory. Both sides of the†¦show more content†¦The actual beginning, however, was when a Union patrol stumbled upon the Confederates and then they began skirmishing. Eventually, when the bulk of the Confederate army had come to the Union lines the skirmishing became a full-on charge. The Union command was late to respond and found its soldier being continually pushed back. â€Å"Sherman too was warned,† writes Shelby Foote in his classic Civil War commentary The Civil War: A Narrative, â€Å"but took no heed because the alarm was sounded by the same Colonel he had rebuked for crying wolf the day before† (p. 333). He felt that way until, finally responding to the summons, had both his aide and his hand shot by the enemy. An article on the website for the Civil War Trust states that almost two-thirds of the Union land force was routed in this first rush (Sword). Additionally, many Confederates slowed during this attack in order to loot the Union camps and fill their starving stomachs with the breakfasts of those they had just driven out. With their ferocious cries, the Confederates had overwhelmed the unprepared soldiers in blue. Johnston hoped to use the momentum of this charge to seal the Confederacy’s defeat. He wanted to trap the Union forces using the river banks they had chosen to camp beside for protection. Johnston spoke on his plan, saying, â€Å"they can present no greater front between those two creeksShow MoreRelated Wars and Conflicts in American History Essay example2574 Words   |  11 Pagesof hostility, conflict, or antagonism; b. a struggle or competition between opposing forces.† War has been a part of this great nation since the beginning. The Seven Years’ War, The Revolutionary War, and The Civil War were some of the bloodiest battles ever fought over the years in the United States. Let’s take a walk through history and look at why these wars were fought, the courses they each took, and the impact they had on the United States today. The Seven Years War, or the French andRead MoreGeneral Sherman And The Match Of The Sea1919 Words   |  8 Pages13th United States Infantry . General Sherman later experienced combat at the first Battle of Bull Run, where he led a division of General Tyler’s men. Unfortunately, he lost the battle, but President Abraham Lincoln saw his promise and promoted him to Brigadier General on August seventh, 1861. Before his March to the sea he had accomplished a lot, an example of this is the Atlanta campaign that took place between May and September 1864. Together with General Grant, they believed that they had to destroy

Espionage Act 1917 Free Essays

Many historians, politicians, experts, believe that the Espionage Act of 1917 was one of the must controversial laws passed. This law was passed on June 15, 1917 shortly after the United States entered world war I. The reason why many people believe this law was so controversial, is that many argue that it directly affected the constitutional right of freedom of speech. We will write a custom essay sample on Espionage Act 1917 or any similar topic only for you Order Now The reason is because this act originally prohibited any attempt to interfere with military operations, to support United States enemies during wartime, it also prohibited promoting insubordination, disloyalty, mutiny, refusal in the military, and or to interfere with military recruitment. The punishment for braking this law could be punishable by death or by imprisonment for not more that 30 years or both and fines up too $10,000. Moreover, many believed that this restrictions were unconstitutional, but later on in 1919 the U. S Supreme Court unanimously ruled in court case Schenck v. United States that the act dud not violate the freedom of speech of those convicted under its provisions. President Woodrow Wilson Attorney General Thomas Watt Gregory and Jon Crawford supported the pass of the act, however the viewed it as a compromise. This document it quite important to historians that would like to study laws related to people leaving in the United States during this era. This article helps historians understand the importance of the U. S trying to keep a sense of control on their own grounds. By the government implanting this law they can feel a little safer of retaliation. Regardless, people still protested and did things that opposed the law. However, by having the law it helps to keep that control. This shows historians that besides all the problems going on overseas, the president it still had and â€Å"urgency† of having some type of law protecting the U. S form any type of anarchy, or interference with the military. Moreover, this document can give a lot of insight to historians that study human group movements or the arrest of political figures. For example, anti-war groups like Frayhayt or â€Å"left-wing† politicians like Bill Haywood, Philip Randolph, John Reed. This document could be used for historians with a specialty in law, or historians that study political people and group organizations during this time How to cite Espionage Act 1917, Papers

Notes on Police and Legal Legitimacy †Free Samples to Students

Question: Discuss about the Notes on Police and Legal Legitimacy. Answer: Introduction: As per the Police Act 1990 (NSW), one of the key value highlight in the statement of values is upholding the rule of law (NSW Government, 2012). The rule of law refers to a system where the law is supreme and decision is based on law rather than on the whims and desires of the government or individual in power. Additionally, it also implies that no person or institution is above the law and also that the law applied would be same for any person or institution of the state irrespective of their wealth, power or position. The upholding of rule of law is a vital pre-requisite for the functioning of democracy (Jackson et. al., 2012). The upholding of rule of law plays a very crucial role in securing the legitimacy of police. This is primarily because rule of law ensures that police cannot be used as a tool by the government or individual in power to attain political objectives. In the absence of the police upholding the rule of law, the police functioning would be reduced to the whims and fancies of the government in power. However, under the rule of law, the police officials are driven by the laws of the land and trace the indirect authority from the Constitution instead of the government or the head (Bradford, MurphyandJackson, 2014). Also, upholding the rule of law implies that the underlying law would apply equally to all the citizens of the country including the rich and politicians. If the rule of law is not upheld, then it may be possible to extend differentiated rules to different people based on their power and position (Jackson et. al., 2012). However, such a discriminatory behaviour would tend to undermine the legitimacy of police in the eyes of common people who would consider police as a measure of suppression and control. Besides, upholding this value also ensures that politicians and the rich are kept under control. Since the same laws apply to the rich and powerful, hence they cannot take the system for granted. Thus the incidence of systemic corruption would remain under check if this value is upheld by the police force (Bradford, MurphyandJackson, 2014). References Bradford, B.,Murphy, K.andJackson, J.(2014), Officers as mirrors: policing, procedural justice and the (re)production of social identity, British Journal of Criminology, 54(4), pp.527-550 Jackson, J., Bradford, B., Hough, M. and Murray, K. H. (2012), Compliance with the law and policing by consent: notes on police and legal legitimacy [online] Available at https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/30157/1/Jackson_etal_Compliance_with_the_law_and_policing_by_consent_2012.pdf [Accessed March 30, 2018] NSW Government (1990) Police Act 1990 No 47, [online] Available at https://legislation.nsw.gov.au/inforce/3b3d09c0-7b19-6d3d-ea5a-e0977c6a6a35/1990-47.pdf [Accessed March 30, 2018]